Satham Hussain@Satham v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Seventeenth day of July Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.12103 of 2018 1.SATHAM HUSSAIN@SATHAM 2.SABIR RAHMAN ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 5 and 6 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DINDIGUL TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

Crime No.302 of 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.MAHENDRAPATHY for Mr.K.MANIKANDAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are figuring as A5 and A6 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 307, 302, 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.302 of 2018, on the file of the respondent.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent. 3.It is a case of double murder. The accused appeared to have formed an unlawful assembly and had attacked the unarmed victims. Since, the matter involves the murder of two unarmed women, this issue viewed by this Court seriously.

4.Taking note of the serious allegations made against the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 17/07/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DINDIGUL TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2.OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON,DINDIGUL.

3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12103 of 2018 Date :17/07/2018 TK/MMS/ASVM/25.07.2018/2P-4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/