Ibhu @ Sheik Ibrahim v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/04/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Ibhu @ Sheik Ibrahim ... Petitioner / Sole Accused Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police, Fort Police Station, Trichy City.

(Crime No.313 of 2023.) ... Respondent / Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.P.Yasmin Begum, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.313 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Sole Accused who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 of I.P.C., in Crime No.313 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had committed theft of cell phone worth of Rs.27,000/-. Hence, the case. 3.Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

4.It is seen from the records that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are close friends. When they were travelling in the same car, the petitioner stolen his cellphone. 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and 1/3

also the fact that the petitioner is not having any bad antecedents, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Trichy, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 20/04/2023 / TRUE COPY / /04/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

SJI 2/3

To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Trichy.

2.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Trichy District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Fort Police Station, Trichy City.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.P.YASMIN BEGUM, Advocate ( SR-6186[I] dated 20/04/2023 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7360 of 2023 Date :20/04/2023 ED/CG/SAR-2 (27/04/2023) 3P 6C 3/3