← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6553/2026granted

Ansari Thameem @ Thameem Ansari v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, B4 Keeraithurai

2026-04-06Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06/04/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

1. Ansari Thameem @ Thameem Ansari

2. Hakkim Sulthan @ Abdul Hakkeem ... Petitioners/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, B4 Keeraithurai Police Station, Madurai District.

Crime No.132 of 2026.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.J.Yogeswaran, For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS 1/6

PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime no.132 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS in Crime No.132 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are business partners. On the pretext of requirements for the Onam festival, the accused placed further bulk orders and the defacto complainant supplied goods worth approximately Rs.9,00,000/-. However, whenever the de facto complainant demanded payment, the accused failed to make the same. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are no way connected in the above said incident. They have not 2/6

committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) fairly submits that the petitioners and the defacto complainant are business partners and with regard to money transaction a dispute arose between the parties and no previous case is pending against the petitioners. However, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, as the investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners and also considering the fact that petitioners and the defacto complainant are business partners and with regard to money transaction a dispute arose between the parties and no previous case is pending against the petitioners, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be 3/6

released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai, and on further conditions that:

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks, and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

4/6

(P D B J) 06.04.2026 TTA TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai.

2.Inspector of Police, B4 Keeraithurai Police Station, Madurai District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL,J TTA

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6553 of 2026 Date : 06/04/2026 6/6