Suresh v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21/06/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN Suresh, ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Aranthangi Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

Cr.No.297/2022.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : MR.R.Prasanna, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.Thganga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Crime No. 297/2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.297 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to family dispute, the petitioner abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked him and caused injuries to him. Therefore, the present case came to be registered.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that no previous case is pending against this petitioner.

1/3

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the petitioner is not having any previous cases. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, with stringent conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned; and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.30 am until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 21/06/2022 / TRUE COPY / 24/06/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

tta Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARANTHANGI.

2 DO THROUGH:

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARANTHANGI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2/3

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.R.PRASANNA, Advocate ( SR-5910[I] dated 22/06/2022 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9796 of 2022 Date :21/06/2022 PKP/SVR/SAR-4/24.06.2022/3P/6C 3/3