Satheeshkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 01.06.2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI Satheeshkumar ... Petitioner/A2 Vs State Represented by its The Inspector of Police, Jeyamangalam Police Station, Jeyamangalam, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District.

Crime No.81 of 2022 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karuppasamy Pandian, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.81 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A2 apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.81 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel arose between the parties, due to which, the petitioner and other accused abused the de-facto complainant in filthy language and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

1/3

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner attacked the de-facto complainant and caused him injuries. He would further submit that the injured was discharged from the hospital.

5.Considering the nature of the allegation levelled against the petitioner and considering the fact that the injured was discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam, Theni District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 01/06/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

sji/lm Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERIYAKULAM, THENI DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH:

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT.

2/3

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JEYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, JEYAMANGALAM, PERIYAKULAM TALUK, THENI DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1CCtoM/s.M.KARUPPASAMY PANDIAN,Advocate(SR-5120[I]dated 01/06/2022)

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9717 of 2022 Date :01/06/2022 PKP/PN/SAR-4/02.06.2022/3P/6C 3/3