Mariappan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Fifth day of July Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.12649 of 2018 1 MARIAPPAN 2 CHINNASAMY 3 RAMATHAL 4 MURUGATHAL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Rank Not Known Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALANI TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT IN CR NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.D.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C. in Crime No.217 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) points out that the petitioners 1 and 4 are not accused in this case. Accordingly, this petition is closed with regard to them.

4.Further, it appears that the injured person in this case has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Therefore, taking into account of these circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 2 and 3 with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners 2 and 3 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 2 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners 2 and 3 shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5.The petitioners 2 and 3 shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

6.This criminal original petition is dismissed with regard to the petitioners 1 and 4.

sd/- 25/07/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALANI, DINDIGUL 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALANI TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.14018 TM JAM/31/07/2018/RR /SAR 1 /2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12649 of 2018 Date :25/07/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/