Selvaraj v. The Superintendent Of Police
H.C.P.(MD) No.952 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :12.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI H.C.P.(MD) No.952 of 2021 Selvaraj ... Petitioner/Husband of the detenue -vs1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Sanarpatti Police Station, Dindigul District.
3.Rev.Fr.Premkumar ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce the person or body of the detenue Lilly Pushpam, wife of Selvaraj, aged about 40 years before this Court and set her at liberty.
For Petitioner :
Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondents :
Mr.S.Ravi 1 and 2 Standing Counsel for the State
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by B.PUGALENDHI, J.] This habeas corpus petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to produce the detenue namely, Lilly Pushpam, wife of Selvaraj, aged about 40 years before this Court and set her at liberty.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court. 3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the second respondent Police has produced the detenue. The detenue, who is working as a Human Resource Manager in a Non-Governmental Organization at Delhi, appeared before this Court through video conferencing and submitted that she does not want to live with the Petitioner/ her husband, any more.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
H.C.P.(MD) No.952 of 2021 4.In view of the above statement made by the detenue, this Court is of the opinion that nothing survives for adjudication in this Habeas Corpus Petition and accordingly, the same stands closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vsn Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To:
1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Sanarpatti Police Station, Dindigul District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.S.C.HEROLD SINGH, Advocate ( SR-22019[F] dated 12/07/2021 ) H.C.P.(MD) No.952 of 2021 12.07.2021 VR(CO) KB(29.07.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2