R. Vivekanandhan v. Prasanna,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Tenth day of August Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL MP(MD) No.5635 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.9938 of 2018 R. VIVEKANANDHAN ... PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Vs 1 PRASANNA ...1st /RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SETHUBAVACHATHIRAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

(CRIME.NO.167/2017) ...2nd RESPONDENT/...2nd RESPONDENT/INVESTIGATING OFFICER Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to cancel the order granting anticipatory bail to the 1st respondent accused NO.1/Prasanna in Crl.O.P(MD).No.9938/2018 dated 20/06/2018. Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.ISAAC MOHANLAL Senior Counsel for M/S.K.M. THIRUPATHI, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.OHM CHARIMA PRABHU Additional Public Prosecutor for R2 and Mr.S.M.A.JINNAH Advocate for R1 for the Respondents the court made the following order:- Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner/defacto complainant and the learned counsel appearing for the accused as well as the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side).

2. This Court had granted bail to the accused herein, in view of the filing of the final report by the police. To cancel the said order, this miscellaneous petition has been taken out by the defacto complainant.

3. This Court firmly told the learned counsel appearing for the accused that the accused will have to abide by law and that any breach of undertaking given before this Court would lead to serious consequences. Thereupon, the learned counsel appearing for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

accused on instructions from the accused undertook that he will take recourse to civil remedies and that unless he gets any decree in his favour from the competent Court, he would not interfere with the rights of the defacto complainant insofar as the Survey Nos.45/15-A and 15-B are concerned.

4. Recording the said undertaking, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

sd/- 10/08/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ,PATTUKOTTAI, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONNAM.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SETHUBAVACHATHIRAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+2. C.C. to Mr.M. SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate SR.No.15355 +1. C.C. to Mr.S.M.A.JINNAH Advocate SR.No.15361 PS/JC/SAR-4:27/08/2018:2P/8C

ORDER

IN CRL MP(MD) No.5635 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.9938 of 2018 Date :10/08/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/