Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6865/2015dismissed

Rengarajan v. The Director General Of Police

2017-06-21Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH W.P.(MD)No.6865 of 2015 1.Rengarajan 2.R.Selvamani : Petitioners -Vs1.The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai-600 006.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Subramanyapuram, Trichy.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Subramanyapuram, Trichy.

4.The Inspector of Police, Geeyer Puram Police Station, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy District.

5.The Sub Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, D.P.O. Trichy.

6.Mrs.Anitha [R-5 and F-6 impleaded as party-respondents as per the order of this Court dated 21.06.2017 in M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015] : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to take necessary action on the basis of the petitioners' representation dated 14.08.2014, within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioners : Mr.C.Jeganathan For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, Additional Government Pleader **********

O R D E R

At the outset, this Writ Petition deserves to be dismissed on the ground that the same is not maintainable, in view of the law laid down by this Court in Sugesan Transport Pvt. Ltd., v. the Assistant Commissioner of Police, J2 Adyar Police Station, Chennai and another reported in 2016(5) CTC 577.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. However, it is the grievance of the petitioners that Anitha, Sub-Inspector of Police, has not acted upon the complaint given by the petitioner and, therefore, action should be taken against the said Anitha, Sub-Inspector of Police.

3. In this regard, the Superintendent of Police has conducted an enquiry and has filed a counter stating that on the complaint given by the petitioner, an enquiry was conducted and there was no cause of action to say that there was acts of land grabbing. He has also stated that the allegation against Anitha, Sub-Inspector of Police is false. Recording the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai-600 006.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Subramanyapuram, Trichy.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Subramanyapuram, Trichy.

4.The Inspector of Police, Geeyer Puram Police Station, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy District.

5.The Sub Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, D.P.O. Trichy.

+1cc to THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER in Sr.NO.61648 +1cc to VEERA ASSOCIATES in SR. No.61772 SML JS/KP/SAR.1/4.7.2017//2P-8C Order made in W.P.(MD)No.6865 of 2015 Dated: 21.06.2017 (3/4) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/