Rameswaran v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.04.2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL Rameswaran ... Petitioner / Accused Rank Not Known Vs.

The State of Tamil Nadu rep by The Inspector of Police, Maraneri Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

(Crime No.98 of 2025) ... Respondent /Complainant PRAYER :- The Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 praying to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in Crime No.98 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :

Mr.E.Mareeskumar, Advocate For Respondent :

Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/7

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner on 09.04.2025 under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent-police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(2) of BNS, 2023, and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, 2002, in Crime No.98 of 2025 on the file of the respondent-police.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 08.04.2025, the defacto complainant preferred a complaint against the petitioner alleging that the petitioner, while in an inebriated condition, used filthy language in the village of the defacto complainant. Upon witnessing the said incident, the defacto complainant questioned the petitioner regarding his behaviour, which led to a wordy quarrel between them. Subsequently, the defacto complainant lodged the present complaint against the petitioner. Hence, the case.

4. Mr.E.Mareeskumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by 2/7

the prosecution. He further submits that a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. He however submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. Accordingly, he prays to grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

5. Per contra, Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent-police, submits that there are totally five accused persons in this case and the petitioner has been arrayed as A5. He further submits that the accused person abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and threatened with dire consequences. He further submits that there are no previous cases against the petitioner. However, he contends that if pre-arrest bail is granted to the petitioner, he will commit a similar offence in future. Hence, he prays to dismiss this Criminal Original Petition.

6. Heard on both sides. This Court has perused the records.

7. The petitioner has permanent residence and deep roots in the society and therefore, there is less possibility of absconding. Considering the same and the nature of the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, and considering the fact that there is no injury caused and also taking note of the fact that there are no 3/7

previous cases against the petitioner, and with a view to give an opportunity to the petitioner to reform himself, this Court is inclined to grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall be released on pre-arrest bail in the event of his arrest or in the event of his surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sivakasi, within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) along with two sureties each for a like sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sivakasi. (ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Judicial Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure their identity.

(iii) The petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent-police weekly twice i.e., on every Monday and Friday at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. 4/7

(iv) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.

(v) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (vi) The petitioner shall also not, directly or indirectly, cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper the evidence. (vii) The petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

(viii) The petitioner shall furnish his residential address and mobile number to the concerned Magistrate.

(ix) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate or Trial Court, as the case may be, is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions are 5/7

imposed by him as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283].

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to the conditions stated supra.

sd/- 22/04/2025 / TRUE COPY / /05/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

PAL TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, SIVAKASI.

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT @ SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARANERI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

6/7

+1. CC to E.MAREESKUMAR Advocate SR.No.26318 (F) dated 23/04/2025

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6866 of 2025 Date :22/04/2025 HPS/29.05.2025 /7P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 7/7