Udayakumar v. The Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25.04.2023 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Udayakumar ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Thiruchitrambalam Police Station, Thiruchitrambalam, Thanjavur District.
... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant permission and protection for cultural event namely Adal Padal scheduled to be held on 29.04.2023 about 07.00 pm to 11.55 pm in connection with Chithirai Thiruvizha in the month of Chithirai in Arulmighu sri Muthumariamman Temple at Punavasal, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District, by consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.04.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr. Anandha Prakash.A For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/5
O R D E R
The writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission and protection for cultural event namely Adal Padal scheduled to be held on 29.04.2023 about 07.00 pm to 11.55 pm in connection with Chithirai Thiruvizha in the month of Chithirai in Arulmighu sri Muthumariamman Temple at Punavasal, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District, by consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.04.2023.
2. Mr. R.Suresh Kumar, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that festival for the temple, by name, "Arulmighu sri Muthumariamman Temple at Punavasal, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District", is going to be held on 29.04.2023. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme on 29.04.2023, they sought permission of the Police by giving a representation dated 12.04.2023. But, the second respondent has not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, 2/5
the writ petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents would submit that he has no objection for granting permission to conduct a cultural programme subject to time restriction in between 07.00 p.m to 10.00 p.m. on 29.04.2023, and also submitted that the second respondent has received the representation of the writ petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.
5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents.
6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019, along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the second respondent is hereby directed to 3/5
consider the representation of the writ petitioner, dated 12.04.2023 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular, in the light of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side).
7. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
25.04.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No Indu To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Thiruchitrambalam Police Station, Thiruchitrambalam, Thanjavur District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/5
G.ILANGOVAN, J Indu Order made in Dated :25.04.2023 5/5