Manikandan.S v. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police
W.P(MD)No.10994 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08.06.2022 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM W.P(MD)No.10994 of 2022 S.Manikandan ... Petitioner Vs
1. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Puliyankudi, Tenkasi District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Sivagiri Police Station, Tenkasi District.
... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant permission and necessary protection to conduct the Adal Padal Programme on 12.06.2022 at 06.00 PM to 12.00 AM in connection with Thiru Vizha of Arulmigu Sri Madasamy Thirukovil at Rayagiri, Sivagiri Taluk, Tenkasi District. For Petitioner : Mr.Manikandan V.
For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthikumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission and necessary protection to conduct the Adal Padal Programme on 12.06.2022 at 06.00 PM to 12.00 AM in connection with Thiru Vizha of Arulmigu Sri Madasamy Thirukovil at Rayagiri, Sivagiri Taluk, Tenkasi District.
2.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Thiru Vizha for the temple, by name, Arulmigu Sri Madasamy Thirukovil at Rayagiri, Sivagiri Taluk, Tenkasi District is going to be held on 12.06.2022. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
W.P(MD)No.10994 of 2022 a cultural programme, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 23.05.2022. But, the respondents have not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief. 4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the respondents have received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.
5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police.
6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019, along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the second respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 23.05.2022 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular.
7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS I) // True Copy // 10/06/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) lr To
1. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Puliyankudi, Tenkasi District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Sivagiri Police Station, Tenkasi District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
W.P(MD)No.10994 of 2022 08.06.2022 MGJ(10.06.2022) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2