Vijayakumar.T v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21.04.2023 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Vijayakumar.T ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Inspector of Police, Pudukottai Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Pudukottai Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned order in Se.Mu.Aa.No.05/Pudukottai PS/Toodi/2023 dated 17.04.2023 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further direct the respondent Police to grant permission for the oncoming nigh time Kabadi Tournament at petitioner's village viz., Thiruvananthapuram, Allikulam Panchayat near Pudukottai, Thoothukudi, on 21.04.2023 from 3.00 PM onwards and 22.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr. Robert Chandrakumar.I For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor 1/6
O R D E R
The writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned order in Se.Mu.Aa.No.05/Pudukottai PS/Toodi/2023 dated 17.04.2023 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further direct the respondent Police to grant permission for the oncoming nigh time Kabadi Tournament at petitioner's village viz., Thiruvananthapuram, Allikulam Panchayat near Pudukottai, Thoothukudi, on 21.04.2023 from 3.00 PM onwards and 22.04.2023.
2. Mr.B.Nambiselvan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that in order to conduct the Kabadi Tournament on 21.04.2023 from 3.00 p.m., and 22.04.2023, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 17.04.2023, but the second respondent has rejected the writ petitioner's representation 2/6
dated 17.04.2023 stating that it will create a law and order problem. If fresh representation made by the petitioner, the competent authority will pass order imposing restriction with regard to time.
4. On perusal of rejection order shows that there was three specific reasons have been given in the order.
5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019 dated 09.04.2019 along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting programme and tournaments. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the writ petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation incorporating the date and place of the Kabadi Tournament before the third respondent and on such representation, the 3/6
third respondent is hereby directed to consider the same and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of one week from the date of fresh representation based on the above said circular.
7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
21.04.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No Indu 4/6
To
1. The Inspector of Police, Pudukottai Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Pudukottai Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
G.ILANGOVAN, J Indu Order made in Dated :21.04.2023 6/6