← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/7771/2015disposed of

The Rajakamangalam Benefit v. The Director Of Collegiate

2015-04-30Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.04.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD)No.7771 of 2015 The Rajakamangalam Benefit Fund Ltd., rep.by its Director, Suyambu S/o.Mahalingam ...

Petitioner Vs.

1.The Director of Collegiate Education, Office of the Directorate of Collegiate Education, Chennai.

2.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Tiruneveli Region, Tirunelveli.

3.The Principal Audit and Accountant General, Anna Salai, Chennai.

...

Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.04.2015 and 13.04.2015 seeking to take action to recover the dues to the depositors of the petitioners' company.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.R.Andharaj, G.A. for R1 and R2 Mr.P.Gunaseelan, for R3

O R D E R

The Writ petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.04.2015 and 13.04.2015 seeking to take action to recover the dues to the depositors of the petitioners' company. 2.Mr.R.Anandharaj, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.P.Gunaseelan learned counsel take notice for the third respondent. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3.Due to money dispute between the petitioner and one Somasundaram, the petitioner has made a representation. As rightly pointed out by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, for a private dispute a Writ is not maintainable and the remedy lies elsewhere and not before this Court.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.It is no doubt true that the prayer sought in the Writ petition is for a private dispute and hence, the petitioner can avail his remedy before appropriate forum. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar \\True copy\\ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Director of Collegiate Education, Office of the Directorate of Collegiate Education, Chennai.

2.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Tiruneveli Region, Tirunelveli.

3.The Principal Audit and Accountant General, Anna Salai, Chennai.

+1cc to MR.M.Saravanan, Advocate Sr.No.24531 +1cc to the Spl.Govt.pleader Sr.No.24865 W.P.(MD)No.7771 of 2015 nbj NA/KBM/15/06/2015/P2/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/