← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/175/2016closed

Somasundaram v. The Commissioner Of Police

2016-06-01Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Sasidharan,Honourable Mr Justice B. Gokuldas2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.GOKULDAS H.C.P.(MD)No.175 of 2016 Somasundaram : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sri Rangam Police Station, Trichy District.

3.Ramesh [R-3 impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 22.03.2016, made in Crl.M.P.(MD)No.2482 of 2016 in H.C.P.(MD)No.175 of 2016] : Respondents Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the first and second respondents to produce the detenu or her corpus namely S.Kalaivani, D/o.Somasundaram, female, aged about 17 years before this Court and hand over her custody to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Palani Velayutham For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran, Additional Public Prosecutor For Respondent No.3 : Mr.S.Balaji

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition is filed by the father of the detenu alleging that his daughter was found missing. During the currency of this Habeas Corpus Petition, the third respondent was impleaded as a party.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the police produced the detenu before this Court. We have examined the detenu. According to the detenu, she got married to the third respondent on 08.04.2016. The detenu stated that she wanted to go with the third respondent and to live at his residence. We have also examined the third respondent. The third respondent admitted that he married the detenu on 08.04.2016 and he would take care of her.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not present in Court. The learned counsel wanted us to record the factum of marriage of the detenu with the third respondent and close the Habeas Corpus Petition.

4. Since the detenu is a major, she being born on 06.04.1998 and now that she admitted her marriage with the third respondent and her desire to live with him, there is no need for further adjudication of this Habeas +Corpus Petition.

5. The Habeas Corpus Petition is closed with the above observation.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sri Rangam Police Station, Trichy District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.S.Palani velyutham, Advocate Sr.No.27641 +1cc to Mr.S.Balaji,Advocate Sr.No.27514 Sml AA/NGM-MP/SAR-III/08.06.2016/2p-6c Order made in H.C.P.(MD)No.175 of 2016 Dated:01.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/