← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/21823/2018withdrawn dismissed

S.Sankar, v. The District Collector Cum

2019-03-12Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)Nos.21823, 21972 and 22882 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.19747, 19928, 19929, 20764, 20765 of 2018 W.P.(MD)No.21823 of 2018 S.Sankar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector cum Chairman 2.The Project Director,

...Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus thereby direct the respondents to consider the submission of tender documents by the petitioner as eligible one and open the price bid of the petitioner for work covered in Tender notice dated 10.09.2018 in DIPR/3613/Tender/2018 dated 10.09.2018.

W.P.(MD)No.21972 of 2018 S.Sankar ... Petitioner Vs

1. The District Collector cum Chairman

2. The Project Director,

3.M.Kalidoss 4.K.Manikannan

...Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus thereby call for the records of second respondent in TNRRIS 2018-19 Tender Technical Bid Minutes dated 23.10.2018 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's bid document for the work covered in Tender Notice dated 10.09.2018 in DIPR/3613/Tender/2018. W.P.(MD)No.22882 of 2018 S.Sankar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector cum Chairman 2.The Project Director, 3.M.Kalidoss

...Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus thereby call for the records of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.3030/2018/A3 dated 02.11.2018 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and in consequence thereof open the price bid of the petitioner and finalize the tender process in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Karuppasamy Government Advocate (in all writ petitions) COMMON ORDER When these matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Recording the said endorsement, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The District Collector cum Chairman

2. The Project Director, +1cc to Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, Advocate in SR.No. 53292 +3cc to Special Government Pleader Advocate in SR.Nos. 53669,53574&53580 W.P.(MD)Nos.21823, 21972 and 22882 of 2018 12.03.2019 KK-04.04.2019/3P-7C