← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9084/2021ordered

Kamala v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-07-09Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 09/07/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

1. Kamala

2. Sathiyaprakash

3. Sathiyaseelan ... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3 Vs State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Ayakudi Police Station, Dindigul District.

(Crime No. 294 of 2021) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime no. 294 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 to A3, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 342,324 and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.294 of 2021, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there is a previous dispute between the defacto complainant and the first petitioner. As a sequel to that on 30.06.2021 at about 8.00 hrs Kamala pulled her hair, abused her and also asked her to go out of the house. Sathyaprakash tried to broke her right hand. Both of them hold her and Sathyaprakash gave knife injuries on her head. Her daughter was also attacked by Sathyaprakash. Therefore, this case came to be registered.

1/3

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent strongly opposed this petition on the ground that investigation is pending. However, he fairly concedes that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and also the fact that except 324,506 (ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, all other offences are bailable offences, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only)each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b]the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f]If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 09/07/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALANI.

2.-DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AYAKUDI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9084 of 2021 Date :09/07/2021 AAV AE/VR/SAR-V/13.07.2021/3P/5C 3/3