Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/279/2016dismissed

Sabiya v. The Secretary To Government

2016-05-17Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran,Honourable Mr Justice B. Gokuldas2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 17.05.2016 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.GOKULDAS H.C.P(MD)No.279 of 2016 Sabiya .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Secretary to Government, Department of Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Office of the District Collector and District Magistrate, Kanniyakumari District at Nagercoil.

3.The Additional Secretary to Government, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, (Department of Consumer Affairs), Room No.270, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001.

4.The Superintendent of Prison, Palayamkottai Central Prison, Tirunelveli District.

.. Respondents Prayer:- Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus praying to call for the entire records connected with the detention order of the respondent No.2 in P.D.No.09/2016, dated 26.02.2016 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the detenu namely Nazar @ Ismail, Son of Mydheenkannu, aged about 49 years, now detained in Palayamkottai Central Prison before this Honourable Court and set him at liberty forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For RR 1, 2 & 4 : Mr.C.Ramesh Additional Public Prosecutor For R - 3 : Mr.M.E.Appan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Central Government Standing Counsel

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.V.MURALIDARAN,J.and B.GOKULDAS,J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to detention order, dated 26.02.2016 passed in P.D.No.09/2016 by the detaining authority, who has been arrayed as the second respondent herein.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has represented that the detention order in question has already been revoked.

3. Considering the aforesaid factual circumstances, the relief sought in the petition has become infructuous.

4. In fine, this Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- Vacation Officer / Assistant Registrar /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary to Government, Department of Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Office of the District Collector and District Magistrate, Kanniyakumari District at Nagercoil.

3.The Additional Secretary to Government, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, (Department of Consumer Affairs), Room No.270, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001. 4.The Superintendent of Prison, Palayamkottai Central Prison, Tirunelveli District. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

H.C.P(MD)No.279 of 2016 17.05.2016 SH/NGM-MP/SAR-III:02.06.2016:2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/