Ramesh.V v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10.06.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Ramesh.V ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police,

2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Jeeyapuram, Trichy District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Somarasampettai Police Station, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, the respondent herein to grant permission to conduct the Karagattam program on 13.06.2022 and Isai Kacheri (Orchestra) program on 14.06.2022 in Arulmigu Maha Mariamman Temple, situated at Kumaravayalur, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 03.06.2022. For Petitioner : M/s Haroon Rasheed.D.S, For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to grant permission to conduct the Karagattam program on 13.06.2022 and Isai Kacheri (Orchestra) program on 14.06.2022 in Arulmigu Maha Mariamman Temple, situated at Kumaravayalur, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 03.06.2022.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 1/3

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Temple Festival for the temple, by name, Arulmigu Maha Mariamman Temple, situated at Kumaravayalur, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy District is going to be held from 12.06.2022 to 14.06.2022. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programmes i.e., Karagattam program on 13.06.2022 and Isai Kacheri (Orchestra) Program on 14.06.2022, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 03.06.2022. But, the third respondent has not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.

4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the third respondent has received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.

5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police.

6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019, along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the respondent police is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 03.06.2022 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular.

7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS I) // True Copy // 10/06/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) lr To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, 2/3

2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Jeeyapuram, Trichy District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Somarasampettai Police Station, 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

10.06.2022 MGJ(10.06.2022) 3P 5C 3/3