Rajendiran G v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.04.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI G.Rajendiran : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Tahsildar, O/o. The Tahsildar Office, Vembakottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

3.S.Shanmugavel : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to conclude the appeal proceedings pending before him in Na.Ka.No.A3/6866/2024 preferred by the petitioner. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.M.Lingadurai, Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

The petitioner, aggrieved by the order passed by the second respondent has preferred an appeal to the first respondent. 2.Admittedly, even according to the petitioner, the first respondent has commenced the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A3/6866/2024. However, the grievance of the petitioner is that there has been no progress in the said appeal, for the past more than one year.

3.Considering the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to hear the pending appeal of the petitioner, within a period of twelve [12] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after hearing the parties before him. There shall be no order as to costs.

24.04.2025 Index :Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes/No MR 2/4

To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Tahsildar, O/o. The Tahsildar Office, Vembakottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

3/4

P.B.BALAJI.

, J.

MR 24.04.2025 4/4