Jeya Lakshmi v. The Commissioner Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 06.06.2024

CORAM

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Jeya Lakshmi ... Petitioner versus

1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Thirunagar, Madurai.

3. Aadhi Narayanan ... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action upon the petitioner's representation dated 27.03.2024, which is still pending before them. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Venkatesan For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. side) 1/4

O R D E R

Seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate action upon the petitioner's complaint dated 27.03.2024, this writ petition has been filed.

2. Though this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that based on the petitioner's complaint, enquiry was conducted and the same was closed as mistake of fact.

3. In view of the said submission, this writ petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy by way of filing a protest petition before the concerned Magistrate. No costs. 06.06.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes ogy 2/4

To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Thirunagar, Madurai.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI,J ogy Order made in 06.06.2024 4/4