T.Sundaram @ Sundarpandi v. The Superintendent Of Police
W.P.(MD)No.11474 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.03.2022 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.P.(MD)No.11474 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.10022 and 10024 of 2020 T.Sundaram @ Sundarpandi
...Petitioner
/Vs./ 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.
2.The Executive Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Palani Taluk Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District.
...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent in M.C.No.17/2020/A7, dated 10.08.2020 and in M.C.No.17/2020/A7, dated 19.08.2020 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramsundar Vijayaraj For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The show cause notices issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer / second respondent, are under challenge in the Writ Petition.
2.The only grievance of the petitioner is that in the show cause notice, the vehicle number has been mentioned, according to him, it is not belonged to him. Therefore, he sought to quash the entire show cause notice.
3.At the outset, I am unable to accept the contention. If at all the vehicle does not belong to the petitioner, he could give a proper explanation to the show cause notices to the Revenue https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
W.P.(MD)No.11474 of 2020 Divisional Officer. Without resorting such measure, as a matter of right, he cannot challenge the show cause notice. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Myr Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.
2.The Executive Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Palani Taluk Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.VEERA ASSOCIATES, Advocate ( SR-10072[F] dated 04/03/2022 ) W.P.(MD)No.11474 of 2020 04.03.2022 RD(16.03.2022) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2