Sanjay v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Edamalapatti Pudhur

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08.04.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 6830 of 2026 1.Sanjay 2.Jesuraj 3.Yuvaraj 4.Vimal 5.Vijay 6.Vijay ... petitioners Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Edamalapatti Pudhur Police Station, Trichy District.

(Crime No.58 of 2026)

...Respondents/Complainant

For petitioners : Mr.S.Manoj Kumar Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 58 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioners, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Section 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 324(4), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.58 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 19.03.2026 at bout 10.00 p.m., when the defacto complainant was working as server, the accused persons entered into the hotel and demanded food as their wish. When the same was refused, since it was not available in the hotel, the accused persons entered into quarrel and attacked the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are no way connected in the above said incident. They have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Co-accused have been arrested and released on bail. Hence, he prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature. The petitioners brutally attacked the defacto complainant by demanding food that was not 2/6

available. Hence, he vehemently opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Injured was discharged from the hospital. However, the petitioners have no previous case. Investigation in this case is still pending.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners, injured was discharged from the hospital and co-accused were released on bail and also considering that there is no previous case pending against the petitioners, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioners is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruchirappalli and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks, thereafter, as and when required for further interrogation:

3/6

[c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

(P D B J) 08.04.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruchirappalli. 2.The Inspector of Police, Edamalapatti Pudhur Police Station, Trichy District.

4/6

(Crime No.58 of 2026) 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL, J.

TM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 6830 of 2026 Date : 08.04.2026 6/6