Prasana v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twelfth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.18467 of 2018 1 PRASANA 2 MOHANADEVI 3 GOTTEESWARI @ SATHYA .. PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CCB, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

(CRIME.NO.33/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.R.ALAGUMANI Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.M.ANANTHA DEVI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294 and 506(ii) I.P.C, in Crime No.33 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a money dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, therefore, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint as against the petitioners herein.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent. 4.It is seen that the petitioners received a OTP number from https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the defacto complainant and withdraw a sum of Rs.55,000/- from the defacto complainant's account.

Considering the nature of

allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory to the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 12/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CCB, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.ALAGUMANI Advocate SR.No.90886 PS/JC/SAR-4;23/10/2018:2P/4C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18467 of 2018 Date :12/10/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/