Saravanan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10/06/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD). No.10220 of 2022
1. Saravanan
2. Kumar @ Arumugakumar
3. Murugan @ Puli Murugan ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 Vs State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Authoor Police Station, Authoor, Thoothukudi District (Crime No.64 of 2022).
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : M/s.Pragalathan N, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.64 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 to A3, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 (Sand theft) of IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.64 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have illegally transported 61 gunny bags of river sand. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case. However, he would further submit that the petitioners without prejudice to their right, are ready to deposit the amount that may be imposed by this Court.
4.No doubt, the petitioners' earlier application was dismissed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9182 of 2022, dated 18.05.2022 on the ground that A1 is having four previous cases and A3 is having three previous cases.
5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent police on verification, they came to know that the first petitioner is having one previous case for similar offence and the third petitioner is having three previous cases including one case for similar offence.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of the offence alleged, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioners 1 and 3 shall pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each and the second petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.15,000/-(Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) to the credit of the District Mineral Foundation Trust, Thoothukudi District, without prejudice to their rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt/acknowledgment before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District.
7.On production of such receipt/acknowledgment, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only)each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:
[a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.
[b]the petitioners shall report before respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
Sd/- 10/06/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.III) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
SJI TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUCHENDUR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
2. -DO- THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
3. THE OFFICER INCHARGE, THE DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AUTHOOR POLICE STATION, AUTHOOR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.PRAGALATHAN N Advocate SR.No.5457
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.10220 of 2022 Date :10/06/2022 SP/VR/SAR III/17/06/2022/3P/7C