D.Priya v. The Commissioner,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.10.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE D.Priya ... Petitioner /Vs./ 1.The Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, Ezhilagam, Cheupak, Chennai-5.

2.The Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, Madurai East, Madurai-20.

3.Prakash Desai ... Respondents P RAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus challenging the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.Aa1/1251/2016 dated 12/04/2019 and quash the same and further directing the 1 and 2 respondents to 1/4

provide death benefit and other monitory benefits with family pension to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar (R1 & R2) Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

On the last hearing date, ie., on 05.09.2024, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had reported no instructions in this matter and this Court had directed the Registry to print the name of the petitioner and post the matter for hearing today. As directed by this Court, Registry had printed the name of the petitioner in the cause list today. Despite printing the name of the petitioner in the cause list, no one has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner has also not chosen to engage a new counsel in place of erstwhile counsel.

2/4

2. This writ petition is of the year 2019. It can be now inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

17.10.2024 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No Sm TO:- 1.The Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, Ezhilagam, Cheupak, Chennai-5.

2.The Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, Madurai East, Madurai-20.

3/4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

Sm Order made in Dated:

17.10.2024 4/4