← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10216/2022ordered

Ramamoorthy v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-06-10Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10/06/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR Ramamoorthy ... Petitioner/Accused No.3 Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Thanthonimalai Police Station, Karur District.

Crime No.213 of 2022.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Santhanam Rajesh Kumar B, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.213 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused No.3, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 394 IPC, in Crime No.213 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 24.04.2022 at about 09.40 p.m., when the de-facto complainant went to the hospital along with one Gayathiri in a two wheeler, the petitioner and other accused waylaid the de-facto complainant, abused them in filthy language, attacked them with hand and snatched the de-facto complainant's ATM Card and also withdrawn a sum of Rs.45,000/-. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that A1 and A4 were already arrested and released on bail.

1/3

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner is having five previous cases including one murder case and that the property has been recovered.

5.Considering the nature of the charges levelled against the petitioner and also the facts that the property has been recovered and that A1 and A4 were already arrested and released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Karur, Karur District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 10/06/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KARUR, KARUR DISTRICT.

2. DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THANTHONIMALAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10216 of 2022 Date :10/06/2022 sji USK/PN/SAR-I/17.06.2022/3P/5C 3/3