K.Suresh v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Sub Inspector Of Police, E1, Thiruppuvanam

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08.04.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 6897 of 2026 K.Suresh ... Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, E1 Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Sivagangai District.

(Crime No.149 of 2026)

...Respondents/Complainant

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Raja Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 149 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.149 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory 1/5

bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 29.03.2026 at 02.30 p.m., due to previous enmity, the accused abused the defacto complainant's husband and attacked him and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. There is counter case has also been registered. Hence, he prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) fairly submits that the offences are grave in nature. Due to previous enmity, both parties attacked each other and counter case has also been registered. Hence, he vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Injured discharged from the hospital. However, the petitioner has no previous case.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of 2/5

offences charged against the petitioner, injured discharged from the hospital and counter case also has been registered and that there is no previous case against the petitioner, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai District and on further conditions that:

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, at 10.30 a.m., on every Saturday for a period of four weeks, thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned 3/5

Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

(P D B J) 08.04.2026 TM To 1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, E1 Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Sivagangai District.

(Crime No.149 of 2026) 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

P. DHANABAL, J.

TM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 6897 of 2026 Date : 08.04.2026 5/5