Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9420/2021disposed of

Sri Lakshmi v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-07-15Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P(MD)No.9420 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P(MD)No.9420 of 2021 Sri Lakshmi ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station, Pudukottai District.

3.Nagababu ..Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, directing the second respondent not to harass the petitioner under the pretext of enquiry on the foisted complaint of the third respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.Lenin Kumar For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This petition is filed seeking a direction to the second respondent not to harass the petitioner under the pretext of enquiry 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that based upon the complaint given by the brother of the petitioner against one Thangaraj, who is paternal uncle of the petitioner, enquiry was undertaken and during the course of the enquiry, it came to light that the sister of the petitioner herself appeared before the enquiry officer and gave a statement that she and her child are in good condition, based on which, the complaint was closed on 09.07.2021.

3.Since the complaint has been closed, nothing survives for further direction or consideration in this petition. Recording the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P(MD)No.9420 of 2021 aforesaid submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS I ) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vrn NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station, Pudukottai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.9420 of 2021 15.07.2021 MGJ(26.07.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2