Madras High CourtLPA(MD)/1/2016withdrawn dismissed

S.Prakash, v. Thiru.Apurva Varma,

2017-07-24Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh,Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 24.07.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR LPA.(MD)No.1 of 2016 S.Prakash ... Appellant Vs.

1. Thiru Apurva Varma, I.A.S., Rep. by the Secretary, Department of Home, State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2. Thiru. Ramanujam,, I.P.S., Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

(Now as Director Information Commissioner, State Information Commission, No.2. Thiagaraja Road, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006.)

3. Thiru. G.Dharmarajan, I.P.S., Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

(Now as Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil) ...Respondents PRAYER: Letter Patent Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the judgement made in Contempt Petition (MD) No.1022 of 2014 in W.P.(MD)No.4974 of 2012 dated 12.08.2015 and allow the Writ Appeal.

Prayer in CONT P(MD). 1022/ 2014 :

Contempt Petitions filed under section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, to punish the contemnors/Respondents for contempt for willfully disobying the order of this court in WP(MD) No. 4974/2012 dated 29.04.2014.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Prayer in WP(MD). 4974/ 2012 :

Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS, calling for the records relating to the District Order No.1785/2011 in Na.Ka.No.P2/39143/2010, dated 10-11-2011, passed by the 3rd Respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents to provide an appointment to the Petitioner by considering his qualification as SSLC.

For Appellant : Mr.S.Rajaprabu For Respondents : Mr.M.Murugan Government Advocate

JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.] The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the prayer in the Letter Patent Appeal has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the same, the Letter Patent Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Secretary, Department of Home, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Director Information Commissioner, State Information Commission, No.2. Thiagaraja Road, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

TA/AM VB/MR/KKR/SAR3/07/08/2017/2P/4C L.P.A.(MD)No.1 of 2016 24.07.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/