M.Chinnian v. The Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.02.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.8930 and 8931 of 2019 M.Chinnian ... Petitioner in WP(MD)No.11808/2019 V.Pitchai ... Petitioner in WP(MD)No.11809/2019 Vs.

1.The Commissioner, Central Provident Fund Organization, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, 14, Bhikaji Coma Block, New Delhi-110 066.

2.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Madurai-2.

... Respondents in both W.Ps.

Prayer in both W.Ps.: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from

making recovery from the petitioners' pension towards the amount paid as commuted value of pension.

In both W.Ps.

For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Saravanan For Respondents :

Mr.K.Muralisankar COMMON ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the relief sought in these writ petitions has become infructuous.

2. In view of the same, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 28.02.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ABR

To 1.The Commissioner, Central Provident Fund Organization, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, 14, Bhikaji Coma Block, New Delhi-110 066.

2.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Madurai-2.

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

ABR 28.02.2025