Rajaram, v. The Superintendent

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.06.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P(MD)No.9738 of 2015 Rajaram ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Gudalur Police Station, Theni District.

3.Murugan @ Elumitchai Murugan 4.Murugan @ Udaivandi Murugan 5.Jeyakodi 6.Devi ... Respondents Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to issue suitable order to the second respondent to give adequate police protection to the petitioner for enjoying his land comprised in Patta No.759 and 1948 in Keelakudalur Village in Uthamapalayam Taluk in Theni District as per the order of this Court made in C.R.P.No.259/2014, date 01.08.2014 by disposing his representation dated 05.02.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Suriyanarayanan For R1 and R2 : Mr.S.Murugan Addl.Govt.Pleader

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to issue suitable order to the second respondent to give adequate police protection to the petitioner for enjoying his land comprised in Patta No.759 and 1948 in Keelakudalur Village in Uthamapalayam Taluk in Theni District as per the order of this Court made in C.R.P.No.259/2014, date 01.08.2014 by disposing his representation dated 05.02.2015.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3.Though the petitioner sought for a larger relief, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the representation given by him on 05.02.2015 may be considered.

Considering the above said submission, without going into the merits of the case, the second respondent is directed to look into the petitioner's representation dated 05.02.2015 and take appropriate action in accordance with law.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- 25.06.2015 This Petition having been posted this Monday the Twenty Nineth Day of June 2015 for being Mentioned in Pursuance to the order of this Court dated 25.6.2015 and made herein in the presence of Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Mr.M.Murugan, Government Advocate for the Respondents 1 and 2 and the Court made the follwoing order.

This Matter is listed, under the caption, 'for being mentioned', at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has brought to the notice of this Court about the order passed in Crl.O.P(MD) No.4989 of 2014, dated 01.12.2014, which is also enclosed in the typed set filed. The order passed by this Court is not on merits. Therefore, the said order is clarified accordingly. While taking note of the said order the 2nd Respondent will have to take into consideration of the case of the respondents 3 to 6 as well as the earlier order passed by the Court in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.4989 of 2014, dated 01.12.2014. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar Ns To To be Substituted for the order already despatched 1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Gudalur Police Station, Theni District.

+1CC to Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan Advocate Sr.No.34435 +1CC to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.32699 GJM/SKS/SARJ-10.9.15-2P-5C W.P(MD)No.9738 of 2015 Dated : 25.06.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/