← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9465/2021dismissed as infructuous

M.R.Ganesh v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-08-11Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9465 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9465 of 2021 M.R.Ganesh ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thanjavur.

3.The General Manager, Dinamalar Daily Newspaper, 25, Birds Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli - 620 001.

... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the first respondent to instruct the second respondent police not to interfere into the civil dispute under the guise of enquiry, without due process of law, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 09.07.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sathiyanathan For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunidhi Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This petition is filed seeking a direction not to interfere in the civil dispute, on the basis of the representation dated 09.07.2021.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is a civil dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent herein, with regard to the business transaction. So, on that basis, third respondent appeared to have given complaint, based upon which, enquiry is stated to be undertaken by the second respondent.

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that based upon the compliant given by the third respondent, enquiry was undertaken in C.No.6372 of 2021 and during the course of the enquiry, the matter https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9465 of 2021 has been settled between the parties and the petitioner alleged to have handed over six post dated cheques, based upon which, the third respondent has given a statement to the effect that no further action is required on his complaint. On that basis, it was closed on 16.07.2021.

4.Since the dispute between the parties was compromised and third respondent has given a statement to the effect that no further action is required, nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this petition.

5.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T & P) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thanjavur.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9465 of 2021 11.08.2021 RS (18.08.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2