← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1275/2019disposed of

Moonlight Recreation Club v. The Superintendent Of Police

2022-03-28Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.1275 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.03.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P.(MD)No.1275 of 2019 Moonlight Recreation Club, having office at 4A, Mudaliyar Kottai, East Street, Sholavandan Represented by its Secretary S.Rajamanickam ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Sholavandhan Vadipatty Taluk, Madurai District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, thereby forbear the second respondent from interfering with the day to day activities of the petitioner's club, except according to the due process of law. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathy Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking direction to the second respondent from interfering with the day to day activities of the petitioner's Club.

2. The case of the petitioner in brief:- The petitioner is the Secretary of recreation Club namely, "Moonlight Recreation Club" situated at Sholavandan, Madurai, which was registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1978, on 23.12.1985. The retired government employees, agriculturist and businessmen are the members of the above said Club. Even though running the Club by strictly complying with the relevant rules and regulations, the second respondent herein foisted false case against the members of the Club and also threatened that he will lock and seal the premises of the Club. Hence, the petitioner herein, sent a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.1275 of 2019 representation to the first respondent herein and the District Collector, by registered post, on 11.12.2018. But, no action has been taken. Hence, this petition.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had applied for proper license before the concerned authorities and the same has not been received so far.

4. It is seen that so far license has not been obtained by the petitioner and hence, this petition is not maintainable. If any trouble arises, after obtaining license the petitioner may work out his remedy, as per law.

5. With the above said liberty, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ebsi Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Sholavandhan Vadipatty Taluk, Madurai District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

W.P.(MD)No.1275 of 2019 28.03.2022 RK(18/04/2022) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2