V.Prema v. The Inspector General Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM CRL.O.P (MD) No.10395 of 2022 V.Prema ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector General of Police, Trichy Region, Trichy.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kulithalai Division, Karur District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Chinthamanipatti Police Station, Karur District.

5. Muthukannu

6. Ganesan

7. Palanisamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to issue a direction, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to advice the 4th and 5th respondents not to interfere in the civil dispute based upon the petitioner's representation, dated 06.06.2022. 1/5

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Gokulraj For R1 to R4 : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R7 : Mr. Ramsundervijayaraj

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for a direction, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to advice the 4th and 5th respondents not to interfere in the civil dispute based upon the petitioner's representation dated 06.06.2022.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is a dispute with regard to the property in S.F.No.589/1D2 to an extent of 3 acre 55 cents situated at Aathanur Village, Kadavur Taluk, Karur District in between the petitioner and the respondents 5 to 7. One of the respondents namely Muthukannu/R5, is working as Police Constable, Chinthamanipatti Police Station, Karur District and by taking advantage that he is a police, the respondent police interfered with the civil dispute. Therefore, the petitioner seeks a direction not to interfere with the civil matter. 2/5

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 submitted that there is no complaint against the petitioner given by any one and the representation dated 06.06.2022 is addressed to the Inspector General of Police, Trichy seeking to advice police not to interfere with the civil matter.

4. On perusal of the records, it is seen that there is no complaint against the petitioner pending before the police station. Now, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that a complaint has been given against the petitioner by the private respondents which was forwarded to redressal committee for enquiry.

5. In these circumstances, this Court cannot pass any orders against the respondent police not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the private respondents.

3/5

6. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is closed, the petitioner is workout her remedy before the appropriate forum. 14.06.2022 Internet:Yes./No Index:Yes/no ebsi To 1.The Inspector General of Police, Trichy Region, Trichy.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kulithalai Division, Karur District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Chinthamanipatti Police Station, Karur District.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

ebsi ORDER IN CRL.O.P (MD) No.10395 of 2022 14.06.2022 5/5