← Library
Madras High CourtTR CMP(MD)/313/2016dismissed

Kr.Annamalai Raja v. An.Usha

2016-10-25Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.10.2016 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM TR.CMP(MD)No.313 of 2016 and C.M.P(MD)No.5722 of 2016 KR.Annamalai Raja ... Petitioner vs.

1)Mrs.AN.Usha 2)Ms.AN.Mahalakshmi ... Respondents Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to pass appropriate order to withdraw the case in MC.No.460/2015 on the file of the Family Court No.I, Chennai and to transfer the same to Family Court, Madurai, or to any other court having competent Jurisdiction to try the matter.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Arunnmozhi Rajashankar For Respondent : Mr.K.Samidurai

ORDER

The marriage between the petitioner and the 1st respondent was solemnized on 03.07.1996 as per the Hindu rites and customs. Due to the strained relationship, the parties are living separately. The 1st respondent/wife filed MC.No.460/2015 on the file of the Family Court No.I, Chennai, for maintenance. The petitioner seeks transfer of the above maintenance case to the Family Court, Madurai. The only reason set out in this petition for transfer by the petitioner/husband is that he has to look after his aged mother who is sick and therefore, he is not in a position to travel from Madurai to Chennai and defend the case filed by the wife at Chennai.

2.The learned counsel for the respondent contended that the reason set out by the petitioner is vague and this Court need not transfer the petition only on the ground that the petitioner's mother is sick and he has to look after her.

3.The facts and circumstances of this case shows that the petitioner/husband left the matrimonial home and living separately. The wife filed the maintenance case before the Family Court No.I, Chennai. The maintenance is for livelihood and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

therefore, the balance of convenience is in favour of the 1st respondent/wife. Contrarily, the petitioner is not paying any maintenance as on today and therefore, he is not entitled for the relief sought for in the present petition.

4.In view of the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is of the view that the case of the petitioner deserves no consideration and accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, C.M.P(MD)No.5722 of 2016 is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar nbi To The Judge, Family Court No.I, Chennai.

+1CC to Mr.C.Arun Mozhi Raja Shankar, Advocate Sr.No.63763 +1CC to Mr.K.Samidurai, Advocate Sr.No.64010 GJM/SKS/RR/8.11.16-3p-4C TR.CMP(MD)No.313 of 2016 25.10.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/