T.Ramakrishnan v. I.Raja

CRL OP(MD). No.10385 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 01/09/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP(MD). No.10385 of 2022 T.Ramakrishnan ... Petitioner/ Defacto Complinant Vs 1.Raja ...1st Respondent/Acused 2.The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Town North Police Station, Dindigul.

Cr.No.174/2022.

...2nd Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Rajesh K, Advocate.

For R1 : Mr.S.K.S.Prabakar, Advocate For R2 : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR CANCELLING THE ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.439 (1)(b) of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- To cancel the anticipatory bail granted in favour of the first respondent/accused by the learned Principal District and sessions judge in Crl.M.P.No.999/2022 dated 13.04.2022. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- This petition has been filed to cancel the anticipatory bail that has been granted in favour of the 1st respondent by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge in Crl.M.P.No.999 of 2022 dated 13.04.2022.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the 2nd respondent would submit that the final report has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul on 09.06.2022. But that was not taken on file so far.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.10385 of 2022 3.The ground, on which this petition came to be filed, is that suppressing the previous bad antecedents of the 1st respondent, the bail has been obtained from the trial Court. The respondent police is present before this Court and has submitted that because of some money transaction issue between the complainant and the accused person, repeated complaints have been given and the cases have been registered against each other.

4.In view of the aforesaid issue, I find absolutely no merit in this petition. Since the final report has been filed, there shall be a direction to the trial Court to process the same that has been presented by the respondent police as per rules and the compliance report must be submitted before the Registry. If any trouble is made by the respondent, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the concerned Court.

5.With the aforesaid liberty, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

sd/- 01/09/2022 / TRUE COPY / /09/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

MM Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DINDIGUL TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10385 of 2022 Date :01/09/2022 RK/SVR/SAR-II (09/09/2022) 2P/3C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2