Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9831/2020closed

P.David Sahaya Baskar v. The Superintendent Of Police

2020-09-16Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan2 pages

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.9831 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.09.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9831 of 2020 P.David Sahaya Baskar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kanyakumari.

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Anjugramam Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the second and third respondent not to harass the petitioner and not to interfere in the family affairs of the petitioner on the guise of enquiry with respect to a false and frivolous complaint given by the petitioner's wife namely Femi Ganaselvi.

For Petitioner : Mr.F.Deepak For Respondents : Mr.C.M.Ganesan Government Advocate (crl.side)

ORDER

This criminal original petition has been filed seeking a direction to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to harass the petitioner and not to interfere in the family affairs of the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

2.Today, when the petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that there is no petition/enquiry is pending against the petitioner. The said submission is recorded. 3.Therefore, in the said circumstances, in the absence of any https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.9831 of 2020 complaint against this petitioner, the respondents shall not call the petitioner for enquiry. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P & A) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cp Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kanyakumari.

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Anjugramam Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.9831 of 2020 16.09.2020 SE(CO) KK(28.09.2020) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2