← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/13379/2019withdrawn dismissed

Iruthayaraj, S/O.Sebastiar v. The District Collector,

2019-08-20Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan,Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fourteenth day of June Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN and The Hon`ble Mr Justice B.PUGALENDHI WP(MD) No.13379 of 2019 IRUTHAYARAJ, ... PETITIONER Vs 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER O/O. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIRENGAM, TRICHY DISTRICT.

... RESPONDENTS Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings issued by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No. A3/3289/2017 dated 22.05.2019 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to lay a Tar Road on the southern side only more fully adjacent to the agricultural fields instead of proposed road on the northern side of Fathima Nagar to Sethurapatti Village, Trichy.

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.B.JAMEEL ARASU, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.A.K.BASKARAPANDIAN, Additional Government Pleader on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:- (ORDER OF THE COURT WAS MADE BY M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.) The grievance expressed by the petitioner by challenging the impugned order is that since lands have been acquired for the purpose of establishing IIIT, the persons in the locality have been denied of roads/pathway to their agricultural lands.

2. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian, learned Special Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. In inner page-3 - Typed set Page-16, in the second paragraph, some alternate suggestions have been made. Therefore, this Court requires the respondents to file a status report as to the implementation of the suggestions given in the said paragraph.

4. Call on 5.7.2019.

sd/- 14/06/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER O/O. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIRENGAM, TRICHY DISTRICT.

ORDER

IN WP(MD) No.13379 of 2019 Date :14/06/2019 GLN AE/PN/SAR-III (19.06.2019) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/