← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12005/2021disposed of

Anandhanarayanan.M v. The Managing Director

2021-07-16Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.Velumani3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :16.07.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI M.Anandhanarayanan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corpn,(Kum) Ltd., No.27, New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn.,(KMB) Ltd, Karaigudi Region, Managiri Post, Maruthapathi, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

3.The Administrator, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pensions Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai -2.

... Respondents PRAYER:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, direct the respondents to disburse interest at the rate of 6% for retirement benefits gratuity, Provident Fund, leave salary and commutation. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Balasubramanian For R3 : Mr.A.Swaminathan

ORDER

Mr.P.Balasubramanian, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents 1 & 2 and Mr.A.Swaminathan, learned counsel takes notice for the third respondent.

2. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3.The petitioner's retirement benefits were settled belatedly and in view of such belated settlement, this writ petition has been filed seeking for interest on the belated payment of the terminal benefits.

1/3

4. It is brought to the notice of this Court that in an identical case of batch of writ petitions entertained by this Court, directions have been issued to the respondent to pay the interest at the rate of 6% on the belated payment of the terminal benefits. This Court does not intend to deviate from the said procedure. 5.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that in view of the financial burden cast on the respondent corporation, they may be permitted to pay the interest on the belated payment in a liberal monthly installments.

6. I am not in agreement with the said representation made. There was already a duty cast on the respondent corporation to pay the terminal benefits on the date of retirement itself and the very fact that the belated disbursement of retirement benefit, would already put the retired employee to serious prejudice. Entertaining the said request for disbursement of the interest on the belated payment in installments, could cause further prejudice to the retired employees.

7. In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the respondents to pay the penal interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits for the period from the date of the retirement till the date of actual disbursement, as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) am Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

2/3

To 1.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corpn,(Kum) Ltd., No.27, New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn.,(KMB) Ltd, Pudukkottai Regional Office, Pudukkottai.

3.The Administrator, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pensions Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai -2.

+1 CC to M/s.K.GOKUL, Advocate ( SR-22901[F] dated 16/07/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Advocate ( SR-23126[F] dated 19/07/2021 ) 16.07.2021 CM(CO) LR (27.07.2021) 3P 6C 3/3