Michel v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 15.06.2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD). No.10371 of 2022

1. Michel

2. Vargheese

3. Yesuraja ... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3 Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Suthamalli Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.128 of 2022)

...Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioners: Mr.P.Saravanakumar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor.

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.128 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/A.1 to A.3, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 420, 354-A(1)(ii) and 34 IPC, in Crime No.128 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 30.05.2022 at about 07.30 a.m., the accused persons trespassed into the defacto complainant's house and doing some pooja for taking away some evil things and when the same was objected by the defacto complainant, the said accused teased her and also they made an attempt to hug her, due to that, the defacto complainant shouted, for which, the accused persons fled away from the scene of occurrence. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the accused 4 to 6 were already arrested and released on bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioners are not having any previous cases.

5.Considering the nature of the charges levelled against the petitioners and also the facts that the accused 4 to 6 were already released on bail and that the petitioners are not having any bad antecedents, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

Sd/- 15/06/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.III) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

CSM

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHERANMAHADEVI.

2. -DO- THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SUTHAMALLI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.SARAVANAKUMAR P Advocate SR.No.5601

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10371 of 2022 Date :15/06/2022 SP/VR/SAR III/21/06/2022/3P/6C