Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12037/2021disposed of

Raja.M v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-07-16Honourable Mrs Justice T. Krishnavalli (Retd.)2 pages

W.P(MD)No.12037 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16/07/2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.KRISHNAVALLI W.P.(MD) No.12037 of 2021 and WMP(MD)No.9482 of 2021 M.Raja ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kannivadi Police Station, Dindigul District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in the civil dispute pending in O.S.No.515 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif, Dindigul by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 03.07.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vairamuthu For Respondents : Mr.RMS.Sethuraman Counsel for State Govt (Crl.side)

O R D E R

This writ petitioner is filed for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in the civil dispute pending in O.S.No.515 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif, Dindigul by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 03.07.2021.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits the suit in O.S.N.515 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif, Dindigul is pending against the petitioner and one Rajendran. During the pendency of the suit, the said Rajendran gave a complaint to the second respondent with false allegations. At the instance of the said Rajendran, the second respondent is interfering in the civil dispute. Hence, the petitioner gave a representation dated 03.07.2021.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 4.Heard both sides.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P(MD)No.12037 of 2021

5. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that the civil suit is pending between the parties, this Court is inclined to issue a direction. Accordingly, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.07.2021 in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. In the result, this petition is disposed of. No costs.Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) CM/VSD To, 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kannivadi Police Station, Dindigul District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

W.P.(MD) No.12037 of 2021 and WMP(MD)No.9482 of 2021 16.07.2021 MGJ(26.07.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2