Veeraiah v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24.05.2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY 1.Veeraiah 2.Periyasamy 3.Chitra 4.Raman 5.Ramayee 6.Mariyammal ... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 5 Vs State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Dhadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District.

(Crime No.168 of 2024) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.M.Maran For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate (Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.168 of 2024 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the 1/5

offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.168 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that it is a case and case in counter and the injuries are simple in nature.

5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the injuries are simple in nature, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of 2/5

the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity. [b]the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. 3/5

[f]If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 24/05/2024 / TRUE COPY / /05/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TA TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DHADIKOMBU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.M.MARAN, Advocate ( SR-5844[I] dated 24/05/2024 ) 4/5

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7328 of 2024 Date :24/05/2024 SA/GS/SAR. /29.05.2024/5P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023. 5/5