C.Subramanian v. The Regional Passport Officer
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.04.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.(MD)No.10334 of 2026 C.Subramanian .. Petitioner - Vs. - The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Officer, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai.
.. Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to renew the Petitioners Passport bearing Passport bearing No.Z3515533 based on his Online application Reference No.26-1054621793 dated 10.03.2026 immediately within a time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. B.Prahalad Ravi For Respondent : Mr.A.Veluchamy, Central Government Standing Counsel 1/6
ORDER
Mr.A.Veluchamy, learned Central Government Standing Counsel takes notice for the respnodent.
2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for a direction to the respondent No.1 to renew the passport bearing File No.Z3515533 pursuant to the online application dated 10.03.2026 submitted by the petitioner.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that, though he has submitted an application for issuance of passport, the same has not been processed by the respondent. According to the petitioner, the application has been kept pending on the ground that criminal case has been registered against him. in Crime No.283 of 2022.
4. Mr. A.Veluchamy, learned Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent, on receiving instructions, submitted that a criminal case has been pending against the petitioner. 2/6
5. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.
6. The refusal to issue or renew a passport is governed by the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967. Under Section 6 of the Act, the Passport Authority is empowered to refuse issuance or renewal of a passport only on the grounds specifically enumerated therein. One such ground is where proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a competent criminal court in India.
7. In the present case, the only reason cited by the respondent is the registration of FIR against the petitioner. However, mere registration of FIR does not fall within the grounds contemplated under Section 6 of the Act. The statutory bar arises only when criminal proceedings are pending before a competent criminal court.
8. Therefore, the action of the respondent in withholding the petitioner's application solely on the basis of the registration of FIR is not in consonance with the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967. 3/6
9. In view of the above, this Court finds merit in the petitioner's contention.
10. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed, and the respondent is directed to process the petitioner's application for renewal of passport in File No.Z3515533 dated 10.03.2026 and issue the passport, subject to the petitioner satisfying all other eligibility criteria prescribed under law.
11. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
12. There shall be no orders as to costs.
15.04.2026 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PJL 4/6
To The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Officer, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai.
5/6
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.
PJL W.P.(MD)No.10334 of 2026 15.04.2026 6/6