B.Vathsala Devi v. The Superintendent Of Police
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9970 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.09.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9970 of 2020 B.Vathsala Devi ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Superintendant of Police, Office of the Superintendant of Police, Dindigul District.
2.The Deputy Superintendant of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendant of Police, Vedasenthur Sub-Division, Dindigul District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police, Vedasenthur Police Station, Dindigul District.
4.B.Velmurugan 5.B.Radhakrishnan
...Respondents
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to issue a direction, directing the respondent No.3 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and her life and limb by considering the petitioner's representation dated 12.08.2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajaselvan For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.Erottuchamy Government Advocate (Crl. side)
O R D E R
This criminal original petition has been filed seeking a direction to direct the third respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's life and limb by considering her representation dated 12.08.2020.
2.Today, when the petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, on instructions, would submit that the complaint of the petitioner has been received by the third respondent and based on which, an enquiry has been initiated in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9970 of 2020 C.S.R.No.337 of 2020 and during enquiry, if it is found protection is required, suitable action will be taken.
3. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD I) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cp Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Superintendant of Police, Office of the Superintendant of Police, Dindigul District.
2.The Deputy Superintendant of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendant of Police, Vedasenthur Sub-Division, Dindigul District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police, Vedasenthur Police Station, Dindigul District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to Mr.R. RAJASELVAN, Advocate ( SR-17483[F] dated 18/09/2020 ) Crl.O.P.[MD]No.9970 of 2020 18.09.2020 VR(CO) KM (28.09.2020) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2