← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12368/2025disposed of

Silambaye R v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2025-04-29Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.04.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL R.Silambaye ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Madurai Collector Office Campus, Madurai District 625 020.

2. The Assistant Director, Survey Department, Madurai Collector Office Campus, Madurai District 625 020.

3. The Tahsildhar, Thasildhar Office, Madurai District 625 218.

4. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Deputy Superintendent of Police Office, Samayanallur Circle, Madurai District 625 402.

5. The Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai 625 501.

1/6

6. The Firka Surveyor, Vavidamaruthur Firka, Madurai District.

7. O.Alagarsamy

8. V.Periyasamy

9. S.Krishnasamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 through 5 to duly consider the representation of the petitioner on 25.02.2025 and consequently to direct respondents 4 and 5 to provide police protection for the fencing of the petitioner's land, specifically located in Survey Number 4/1A, along a stretch of 53 meters on the northeastern and northwestern boundaries of 80.032 feet, situated in Vavidamaruthur Village, Vadipatti (TK), Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.Mohamed Azarudeen Sharof For R1, R2, R3 : Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar & R6 Government Advocate For R4 and R5 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 2/6

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 5 to duly consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.02.2025 and consequently to direct respondents 4 and 5 to provide police protection for the fencing of the petitioner's land. 2.According to the petitioner, he sent the representation dated 25.02.2025 to the fifth respondent, but the same has not been considered. Hence this petition.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner's representation is under consideration with the fifth respondent and they will conduct enquiry and take appropriate action, in accordance with law. 4.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without even issuing notice to the private respondents, is inclined to pass order.

3/6

5.Considering the prayer of the petitioner, recording the said submission that the petitioner's representation is pending with the fifth respondent, this Court directs the fifth respondent to conduct enquiry upon the petitioner's representation dated 25.02.2025 and take appropriate action, in accordance with law, within a period of fifteen days, from the date of this order.

6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 29.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR 4/6

To

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Madurai Collector Office Campus, Madurai District 625 020.

2. The Assistant Director, Survey Department, Madurai Collector Office Campus, Madurai District 625 020.

3. The Tahsildhar, Thasildhar Office, Madurai District 625 218.

4. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Deputy Superintendent of Police Office, Samayanallur Circle, Madurai District 625 402.

5. The Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai 625 501.

6. The Firka Surveyor, Vavidamaruthur Firka, Madurai District.

7.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P.DHANABAL , J.

LR 29.04.2025 6/6