Chinnarasu v. The Superintendent Of Police

H.C.P.(MD) No.1033 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU H.C.P.(MD) No.1033 of 2021 Chinnarasu ... Petitioner/Father of the detenue Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Natham, Dindigul District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents herein to produce the person or body of the petitioner's daughter namely, Sharmila, aged 16 years, before this Court and hand over custody to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Muthusamundeeswaran For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravi Standing Counsel for Government

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.] The prayer in the Habeas Corpus Petition is to direct the respondents to produce the person or body of the petitioner's daughter namely, Sharmila, aged 16 years, before this Court and hand over custody to the petitioner.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court. 3.The petitioner is the father of the detenue. It is alleged that the detenue is found missing from 07.07.2021. 4.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the petitioner as well as the detenue appeared before this Court. On enquiry, the detenue submits that she is willing to go with her father.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

H.C.P.(MD) No.1033 of 2021 5.In the light of the above statement, we are of the opinion that no further adjudication is required in this Habeas Corpus Petition and accordingly, the same stands closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To:

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Natham, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

H.C.P.(MD) No.1033 of 2021 03.08.2021 RS (17.08.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2