Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9705/2021dismissed

B.Thandeeswaran v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-07-22Honourable Mr Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup2 pages

in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.9705 and 9707 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 22/07/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP CRL OP(MD). Nos.9705 and 9707 of 2021 B.Thandeeswaran ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 in both cases Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Mallanginaru Police Station, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondent/Complainant (in both petitions) Crime No.68 of 2021 ...(IN CRL OP(MD) 9705/2021) Crime No.69 of 2021 ...(IN CRL OP(MD) 9707/2021) in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.9705 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Chinnaian, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.Muthumanickam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.9707 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr.L.Prabhu, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.Muthumanickam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITIONS FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C COMMON PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime Nos.68 and 69 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent Police.

COMMON ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.9705 and 9707 of 2021 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the very same petitioner has filed these criminal original petitions and the defacto complainant is different in these cases. He further submits that the petitioner is a Graduate of Bachelor of Arts (History) and due to previous enmity, the defacto complainant has given a complaint against the petitioner. Hence, the learned counsel seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent objects to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner stating that the petitioner has 3 previous cases. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the gravity of offences committed by the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petitions are dismissed.

sd/- 22/07/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MALLANGINARU POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI DISTRICT.

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD). Nos.9705 and 9707 of 2021 Date :22/07/2021 SA/SRS/SAR.1/26.07.2021/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2