Chinnapoovan v. State Rep By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.07.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN W.P.(MD)No.11175 of 2023 and W.M.P(MD).No.9758 of 2023 Chinnapoovan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.State rep.by The District Collector, Collectorate Campus, Dindigul.

2.State rep.by The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, 3.State rep.by The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, 4.State rep.by The Tashildar, Vedasandur Taluk, 5.State rep.by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, 1/6

Vedasandur, 6.State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station, 7.Periyasangan 8.Chinnapoovan 9.Kanniammal 10.Rasu @ Veerasangan 11.Ponnusamy 12.Ooran ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.04.2023 and direct the respondents 3 and 5 to direct the 6th respondent to monitor and forbearing the respondents 7 to 12 in interfering the petitioner's family members from the usage of the well, borewell and cultivation in the properties at Malapatti, Paganatham Village, Eriyodu Sub Registration District, Palani Registration District, Dindigul District as mentioned in O.S.No.100 of 2012 on the file of the Sub Court, Vedasandur until the disposal of the appeal suit in A.S.No.30 of 2012 before the Additional District and Sessions Court, Dindigul.

2/6

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For R1 to R3 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to provide police protection in enjoying the properties belonging to the petitioner, as per the representation dated 20.04.2023.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the official respondents submits that after receipt of the representation dated 20.04.2023, the petitioner and the respondents 7 to 12 were asked to appear before the Police, however, the petitioner has failed to appear and the other respondents appeared before the Police Station and gave an undertaking that they will not interfere in the properties belonging to the petitioner. Since the respondents themselves have given an affidavit that they will not interfere in the properties of the petitioner, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

3/6

3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 06.07.2023 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No ssb To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Campus, Dindigul.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, 3.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, 4.The Tashildar, Vedasandur Taluk, 5.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vedasandur, 4/6

6.The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station, 7.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

DR.D.NAGARJUN,J ssb W.P.(MD)No.11175 of 2023 Dated: 06.07.2023 6/6