Palani Selvan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28/09/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN 1.Palani Selvam 2.Murugan @ Periya Murugan 3.Ramar 4.Mahendran ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.3,4,5 & 6 Vs State rep.by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Keelarajakularaman Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
In Crime No.85 of 2019.
.. Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners: Mr.M.Jothi Basu, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.85 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 406, 420 & 381 I.P.C., in Crime No.85 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the Account Manager of Premier Enterprises, Sankarapandiapuram and the petitioners herein and other accused who are employees worked under the defacto complainant. The allegation is that the petitioners and other accused said to have entered criminal conspiracy and stolen filled cheque book and unfilled cheque book of 1/3
Canara Bank and cash of Rs.5,00,000/-from the Mill. Hence, the complaint.
3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.
4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that A-1 was released on bail on condition to deposit a sum of Rs.2 lakhs and A-2, A-8, A-9, A-11 & A-15 got anticipatory bail before this Court on condition that each of the petitioner should deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten thousand only). Hence, he seek anticipatory bail.
5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, submitted that all the accused have conspired together and stolen Rs.5 lakhs and the said amount not recovered from the accused so far. He further submitted that A-1 released on bail on condition that he should deposit a sum of Rs.2 lakhs and he has also deposited the same and A-2, A-8, A-9, A-11 & A-15 got anticipatory bail before this Court on condition that each of the petitioner should deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten thousand only). 6.Considering the rival submissions and on perusal of the First Information Report, it is seen that A-1 said to have taken Rs.1 lakh and all these petitioners have shared each Rs.
35,000/-(Rupees Thirty Five Thousand Only) and hence, these petitioners have also shared the stolen amount, hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.
(b) the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, to the credit of Crime No.85 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police. (c) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.
2/3
(d)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(e)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(g)if the accused/petitioners thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 28/09/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAJAPALAYAM.
2.DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEELARAJAKULARAMAN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1 CC to M/s.G.M.LAW OFFICE, ( SR-6675[I] dated 29/09/2020 )
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.10022 of 2020 Date :28/09/2020 vsd AE/JC/SAR-II (30.09.2020) 3P 6C 3/3